The
Classics, Strategy and Tactics, Part 8
The Russian Revolution
of 1905
Two Tactics of
Social-Democracy in the Democratic Revolution
The Russian
Social Democratic and Labour Party (RSDLP) held its founding Congress in 1898 in Minsk, Russia (all nine
delegates were arrested). At that time, and in the early 1900s, no distinction was
made between “communists” and “social democrats”. Yet the underlying division
was already there, as we will see from the Lenin’s 1905 book, “Two
Tactics of Social-Democracy in the Democratic Revolution” (download of extensive compilation
linked below).
In 1899 the prominent German Social Democrat
Eduard Bernstein wrote “Evolutionary Socialism”. Both Rosa Luxemburg (in
“Reform and Revolution”, 1900) and
Lenin (in “What is to be Done”, 1902)
came to the defense of the revolutionary path. They opposed Bernstein’s
reformism and what Lenin dubbed his “economism”.
In 1900 Lenin founded the magazine Iskra (“Spark”).
In 1903 the 2nd RSDLP Congress
took place in Brussels and London. It resulted in the split between the Bolsheviks,
led by Lenin, and the Mensheviks, led by Julius Martov. After the 2nd
Congress, control of Iskra passed to
the Mensheviks (from Issue No. 52) and Lenin thereafter refers to it as “the new
Iskra”.
Following
“Bloody Sunday” (January 22nd 1905)
a revolution against the autocracy of the Tsar broke out in Russia. One
consequence was the institution of a commission to create the “Duma”, the
limited Russian parliament, which eventually came into existence in 1906.
Russia 1905
The new
situation was considered by the Bolsheviks at the 3rd RSDLP Congress in May, 1905. The Mensheviks were
meeting at the same time in a “Conference”
in Geneva.
Lenin wrote
“Two Tactics of Social Democracy in the Democratic Revolution” in June and July of 1905, immediately
after the Congress and the Conference. This book is to the Third Congress as “One Step Forward, Two Steps
Back” is to the Second Congress. But it is also different, because the
circumstances are different. In the “Two Tactics” Lenin refers to and
continuously compares the Bolsheviks with the Mensheviks, the Congress with the
Conference, and the old Iskra with
the new Iskra.
The two
tactics (those of the Bolsheviks and those of the Mensheviks) were both supposed
to be attempts at responding to the new circumstances. These are the
circumstances of bourgeois democracy, just then being set up for the first time
in Russia, and the question was: What should the proletarian revolutionaries
do? To understand Lenin’s true answer, you must pay close attention.
The
circumstances are arguably similar in some respects to South Africa at the
present time. Joe Slovo refers to the comparison in his 1988 pamphlet on “The South
African Working Class and the National Democratic Revolution”. We may
say, with Slovo, that ours is not a bourgeois democratic revolution, it is a
National Democratic Revolution. But the question is still: What should the
partisans of proletarian revolution be doing in such a period? Studying this
revolutionary manual of Lenin’s can help us to find answers to this question.
In 1914 most of the national constituents of the Second International opted to support their national governments in the terrible inter-Imperialist slaughter known as the First World War. The Bolsheviks and some others, notably some comrades in South Africa, refused, and opposed the war totally. Only after that time did the permanent distinction grow up between the class-collaborator “Social-Democrat” parties on the one hand, and the Communist Parties on the other.
Lenin was consistent. The 1905 book “Two Tactics of Social Democracy in the Democratic Revolution” is already a sustained blast against the vacillating sellout liberals, and in favour of decisive revolution led by the proletariat. He finishes up with the resounding rhetorical question: “Dare We Win?” In the particular circumstances of 1905, this also meant “Dare we remove the Tsar and make a republic?”
What is a “class collaborator”? Is class collaboration the same as “class alliance”? Absolutely not! Class collaboration is a servile abdication whereby the representatives of the working class subordinate themselves to the interests of the ruling (capitalist) class. The working class is very familiar with such collaborators.
Class alliance, on the other hand, is the necessary politics of revolution. The working class must be independent and it must be autonomous, but it must also have allies from outside of its ranks. In South Africa such allies can be peasants and small business people, professionals and intellectuals, but not the principal oppressor, which is monopoly capital. Class alliance serves to prevent the isolation of the working class, and to split the forces available to the dominant part of the bourgeoisie. Class alliance, as unity-in-action, can also secure vital material gains and tactical victories for the working class.
From 1905
only twelve years had to pass in Russia before the two-revolution year of 1917.
Many documents exist from that period that could be included in a larger
“classics” collection. We will select only two, and then use our penultimate
part for the revolutionary year, and the final part for the post-revolutionary
situation.
Please download and read the text via the following
link:
Further
reading:
The Mass Strike, 1906,
Rosa Luxemburg (13883 words)
No comments:
Post a Comment