National Democratic
Revolution, Part 7
Peasants’ Revolt
The National Democratic Revolution is based upon a clear
understanding of objective, dynamic class politics. It proceeds from a class
alliance against the oppressor class, towards the fullest possible democracy.
There is an interrelationship between the underlying
(objective) class realities and the subjective (conscious) organisational
politics of democracy. In these posts, we have tended either to concentrate
upon one side of this dialectical relationship, or the other.
The previous two parts of this series have been about the
deliberate organisation and mobilisation of the NDR in the 1940s and 1950s.
This part is more about objective class realities, or in other words, about
Political Economy. The next part will be about organised politics again, and
then the final two parts will be of a more synthetic nature, dealing with both
subject and object together.
Looking forward, the last revolutionary confrontation is
bound to be between the big bourgeoisie and its gravedigger, the proletariat
that it must constantly bring into being. Yet it is far from the case that in
the present time all other classes have died out in South Africa. For
success, these other, relatively minor classes should be allies of the
proletariat in the National Democratic Revolution.
Class alliance is essential for the isolation and defeat of
the oppressor, so as to deny the oppressor the comfort of support, and to
prevent the oppressor from isolating and defeating the working class. The
politics of class alliance were practiced in Karl Marx’s time and before that,
in the Great French Revolution. Class alliances were again crucial in the
Russian and the Chinese Revolutions, to name but two out of many. The
hammer-and-sickle emblem of the SACP, first used during the Russian Revolution
of 1917, signifies class alliance between workers and peasants.
In order for a class alliance to be possible, the working
class must be class conscious, and so must the other classes. The latter often
need to be assisted by the working class and by the intellectual partisans of
the working class, the Communist Party. Yet there is rather little in the way
of class-conscious literature about South Africa’s large petty-bourgeois class,
who are for the most part very poor people, and little of a directly political
nature about the agricultural petty-bourgeoisie, who are the peasantry, or
about the oppressors of the rural petty-bourgeoisie and peasantry, who are
South Africa’s bureaucratised feudal class.
The classic exception to this intellectual famine is
communist journalist and Rivonia trialist Govan Mbeki’s [pictured] “Peasants’
Revolt”, published in 1964 (see the link below). Other works such as “Landmarked”,
by Cherryl Walker (Jacana, 2008) tell us that the huge misery of rural
displacement and impoverishment has still not been ameliorated nor turned in a
sufficiently positive direction.
[Pictures:
Pondoland Revolt, taken by Eli Weinberg; Govan Mbeki]
- The above is to introduce the original reading-text: The Peasants' Revolt, C8, Chiefs in the
Saddle, Govan Mbeki.
- To download any of the CU courses in PDF files please click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment