State and Revolution,
Part 1
Lenin
arrives at the Finland Station in April, 1917
The April Theses
This is the first part of our ten-part course on Lenin’s 1917 work
“The State and Revolution”. The book has only six chapters, which we will take
one at a time from part 4 to part 9 of the course. In the first three parts we
will try to furnish some of the prior political context. In part 10 we will
pose the question of where Lenin’s unfinished work would need to be taken, if
it were to be extended in light of the new knowledge that we now have, nearly a
century after Lenin’s Bolshevik Revolution.
The year of 1917 in Russia was actually a year of two revolutions,
and another revolution had gone before, in 1905. The 1905 revolution had seen
the formation of the parliament (the Duma) and also the organs of Russian
popular power, the Soviets. Both the Duma and the Soviets still existed in
1917.
The “Great War”, or “First World War”, of 1914-1918 was still
going on, involving tens of millions of armed men in unparalleled slaughter. It
was an inter-Imperialist war. Russia was fighting Germany. The Bolsheviks (under
Lenin’s leadership from exile in Switzerland) had refused to take part in this inter-Imperialist
war in any way, and instead denounced it and opposed it.
The February 1917 revolution established something resembling a
bourgeois-democratic republic based on the Duma. Lenin returned to Russia from
Switzerland by train in April, just over a month later. All kinds of questions
remained to be resolved. The question of war and peace was the most urgent. The
nature of the revolution was still to be decided. In between April and October,
and among other things, Lenin pronounced the “April Theses”, and wrote “The
State and Revolution”. We will begin with the first of these two.
The April Theses is a classic
document, not because it is polished (it is rough), but because of its impact
at a moment of history. It was given by Lenin verbally. The written version
(download linked below) was prepared very shortly afterwards.
Lenin arrived in Petrograd (also called St Petersburg, and
Leningrad) barely a month after the February, 1917 revolution which had
overthrown the Tsar and installed the bourgeois republican government. This
bourgeois government had the intention of continuing the disastrous
intra-Imperialist war in which Russia was involved.
At the same time, faraway South Africa was also involved in the
same war.
It was among those South Africans who opposed the 1914-18
Imperialist war that the need for our communist party was first seriously
raised. The Communist Party of South Africa was formed by admission to the
Communist International in 1921. That Communist International had been called
for by Lenin in this document, the April Theses, in Thesis 10:
“We must take the initiative in creating a
revolutionary International, an International against the social-chauvinists and
against the ‘Centre’,” it
says.
The Third
International (also called Communist International or Comintern) was duly
established in 1919.
The “social-chauvinists”
of different individual countries (e.g. Germany, Britain, France and Italy as
well as Russia) had supported the Imperialist war against each other, while the
Russian Bolsheviks and the German Spartacists had opposed the war and had
supported proletarian internationalism. The term “revolutionary defencism” was
a code for the further continuation of the Russian war policy, which Lenin
clearly opposes in Thesis 1.
The “April Theses” are short and do not therefore need a long
introduction, but one can usefully highlight the following:
Thesis
2 says: “The specific feature
of the present situation in Russia is that the country is passing from the
first stage of the revolution — which, owing to the insufficient
class-consciousness and organisation of the proletariat, placed power in the
hands of the bourgeoisie — …
“This
peculiar situation demands of us an ability to adapt ourselves to the special
conditions of Party work among unprecedentedly large masses of proletarians who
have just awakened to political life.”
There are echoes of this situation in South Africa today.
Thesis
4 says: “As long as we are in
the minority we carry on the work of criticising and exposing errors and at the
same time we preach the necessity of transferring the entire state power to the
Soviets of Workers' Deputies, so that the people may overcome their mistakes by
experience.”
This led to the slogan “All
Power to the Soviets”, and Thesis 5
then says “to return to a parliamentary
republic from the Soviets of Workers' Deputies would be a retrograde step.”
Thesis
8 says: “It is not our
immediate task to "introduce" socialism, but only to bring social
production and the distribution of products at once under the control of the
Soviets of Workers' Deputies.” In other words, the bourgeois dictatorship
was to be replaced at once by a dictatorship over the bourgeoisie.
Thesis
9 proposes to change the Party’s name from “Social Democrat”
(RSDLP) to “Communist Party.”
So much of this did come to pass, as we know, that it is difficult
to imagine that Lenin’s support for these demands, among the leadership and
even among the strictly Bolshevik leadership, was quite small.
But Lenin knew how the base of the Party was constructed and how
it was reproducing itself. Hence he was able to be bold. He knew that the Bolshevik
cadre force as a whole, and potentially the entire working masses of Russia,
were behind his proposals, or soon would be. And so it came to pass.
The above is to introduce the original reading-text: The April Theses, 1917, Lenin.
No comments:
Post a Comment