Development,
Part 5
Co-Operatives or Protégés?
The classic
literature on co-operatives divides into two parts, characterised first by Marx’s, Engels’ and Lenin’s
disdain for co-ops under the bourgeois dictatorship, and second by Lenin’s embracing of co-ops as the sufficient and
necessary means, under proletarian rule, of uniting the town and the country
and of effecting a transition, for the proletarian and non-proletarian masses
together, into socialism.
For South
Africans this poses theoretical problems.
We cannot
just ignore what the classics say about co-ops under capitalism, not because
they are “classics”, but also because the arguments are strong, and because
ours is still a bourgeois state. Therefore the arguments that Marx makes in
“The Critique of the Gotha Programme”, for example, still apply to us.
Yet we
appear to need the opportunity, that co-ops seem to provide, of socialising
fragmented and incomplete individual efforts, or in other words of organising
the unorganised peasantry, petty-bourgeoisie, and more generally, those whom
capitalism has failed to employ.
In the
light of these considerations, let us look at some of what Karl Marx said about
co-operatives on pages 4, 5, 6 and 9 of “The Critique of the Gotha Programme”.
Most of it is scathing. The best that Marx can manage to say for co-ops is:
“That the workers desire to establish the
conditions for co-operative production on a social scale, and first of all on a
national scale, in their own country, only means that they are working to
revolutionize the present conditions of production, and it has nothing in
common with the foundation of co-operative societies with state aid. But as far
as the present co-operative societies are concerned, they are of value only
insofar as they are the independent creations of the workers and not protégés
either of the governments or of the bourgeois.”
Prior to
the above he remarks (about the Gotha Programme):
“Vulgar socialism (and from it in turn a
section of the democrats) has taken over from the bourgeois economists the
consideration and treatment of distribution as independent of the mode of
production and hence the presentation of socialism as turning principally on
distribution.”
The
co-operation that is patronised by the state, and also state distribution (i.e.
what we now call “delivery”) is only “vulgar socialism”, says Marx.
The
Critique of the Gotha Programme is not a long document (though it is very
rich). Please try to read it. It is invaluable for many purposes, and not just
for this question of co-ops.
Illustration: Sewing Co-operative, Rwanda, 2009
- The above is to
introduce the original reading-texts: Critique of the Gotha Programme,
Marx , Part
1 and Part
2.
- To download any of the CU courses in PDF files please click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment