Course on Anti-Imperialism, War and Peace, Part
2a
Lenin in disguise,
1917
Consequences of
Imperialist War
The origin of the Age of Imperialism, when it became
dominant in the world, were the Imperial wars at the turn of the 19th
to the 20th centuries, and most typically the Anglo-Boer War. It is
the most typical because it showed most clearly what the nature of the new
capitalist Imperialism was.
Britain made war on the Boer Republics, not so as to rule
them directly, and certainly not to liberate the black people living under
those racist regimes, but only to possess the gold mines and other such assets
as they might wish to have.
The current Imperialist war on Libya is not different in overall
nature.
The typical tactic of Imperialism is therefore not direct
colonialism, but neo-colonialism. As the 20th century went on,
neo-colonialism was increasingly substituted for the older system of direct
rule, and the obligations that went with direct rule were abandoned.
This much was described by Lenin in the text that went with
the previous post in this series. Now, it may be helpful to look at the general
situation around 1916, in brief.
The Great Powers had gone to war in 1914 as a consequence of
the tensions that Imperialism had brought with it, in a finite, limited world
that had been divided between them, but unevenly.
Shockingly, from a working-class point of view, the Workers’
(Second) International had, instead of opposing the war, collapsed. The
socialist parties of the contending powers had nearly all opted to support
their different bourgeois governments in the terrible mutual slaughter and
destruction.
Lenin and the Bolsheviks refused to support the war. They formed
the major force in the small “Zimmerwald” International, together with other
formations that wanted to maintain the international working-class position of
opposition to capitalist war.
By then Lenin had been in exile for many years. He remained
in Switzerland, eventually returning to Russia in April, 1917, after the
February revolution of that year. Lenin naturally paid close attention to the
question of Imperialism and wrote a lot about it during this time.
In “The Nascent Trend of Imperialist Economism” (download linked
below), Lenin attacks the “Imperialist Economism” that is against the right to
self-determination and against democracy.
Imperialist Economism has “the knack of persistently ‘sliding’ from recognition of imperialism to
apology for imperialism (just as the Economists of blessed memory slid from
recognition of capitalism to apology for capitalism),” says Lenin.
“Economism” is Syndicalism, or in South African parlance,
“Workerism”. It is the belief that trade union struggles alone can solve the
problems of the working class. It is reformist, and it relies upon the promises
of development of the capitalist economy, with no plans to overthrow it.
“Imperialist Economism” took the reformist logic one step
further, to say that Imperialism should be allowed to develop to its fullest,
in the belief that when the whole world had become one big monopoly, it could
simply be taken over and re-named socialism. The Imperialist Economists
promoted the idea that socialism was the end-destination of the Imperialist
bus-ride, and that all that was necessary was to encourage Imperialism’s
progress, in the name of socialism.
The German Social-Democrat Karl Kautsky, who Lenin called a
“renegade”, and “no better than a common liberal”, became the prophet of
Imperialist Economism.
In the face of this particular brand of treacherous
liquidationism, Lenin was obliged to re-state the necessity for the right of
nations to self-determination (see the second download linked below). This is a
longer document. In it, early on, under the heading “Socialism and the
Self-Determination of Nations”, Lenin wrote: “We have affirmed that it would be a betrayal of socialism to refuse to
implement the self-determination of nations under socialism.”
So as not
to make this introduction to long, let us sum up:
- There is no final separation between
socialism and internationalism
- Nations have the right of
self-determination
In the next
part we will see the consequences of this struggle of ideas as it affected the
world after the Russian Revolution and after the Imperialist world war of 1914 -1918
was over. We will see that Lenin
personally, and the Communist International in particular, were able to map out
the line of march for the National Democratic Revolutions that subsequently liberated
most of the planet from colonialism, including, eventually, South Africa.
Please download and read the text via the following
link:
The Right of Nations to
Self-Determination, 1916, Lenin (14196 words)
Further
reading:
No comments:
Post a Comment