Course on Anti-Imperialism, War and Peace, Part
6
Military and Political
Presuming that we have by now established that we are not pacifists
but are revolutionaries who intend, by any means necessary, to assist the
working class to expropriate the expropriator bourgeois class, which by itself
is a violent act; then why can we not move with speed, and without any
restraint, towards an armed overthrow of the oppressors?
The late William “Bill” Pomeroy started his essay “On the
Time for Armed Struggle” (linked below) from exactly this point of departure, like
this:
“Because of the
decisive results that can follow from an armed smashing of the main instruments
of power held by a ruling class or a foreign oppressor, some of those who
acquire a revolutionary outlook are eager to move to the stage of armed
struggle; and their concept of it as the highest form of revolutionary struggle
causes them to cast discredit upon other forms as 'less advanced', as amounting
to collaboration with or capitulation to the class enemy.”
But, he wrote:
“Too often the aura of
glory associated with taking up arms has obscured hard prosaic truths and
realities in the interplay of forces in a period of sharp struggle.”
And later on, Pomeroy adds:
“The experiences of
the revolutionary movement in the Philippines offer an interesting example of
the complex, varied and fluctuating processes that may occur in a liberation
struggle.”
Pomeroy writes that “analysis
and understanding of the revolutionary experiences of others is indispensable”.
He proceeds to offer his own rich and extraordinary experience as a military
combatant and revolutionary. His main lesson is that the military must never
think that it can cease to be subordinate to the political. Such thinking is
bound to bring disaster, as it did in the Philippines.
Not only is the military subordinate to the political in the
hierarchical sense that the military takes its orders from the political
leadership and reports back to it. It is more than that. The revolutionary
movement goes away from military, and towards political, essentially peaceful
means. Far from armed struggle being the “highest form”, it is a form of
struggle that we do not adopt unless it is forced upon us, and we pursue it, if
we have to, with the main aim of returning as quickly as possible to political
means.
This is not only a revolutionary political principle. It is
also, in terms of the best military theory (that of Clausewitz) a military
principle that force of arms can only serve to return the parties to the
negotiating table. That is all it can do; if it fails to do this much, then military
force is simply a disaster.
The picture shows William and Celia Pomeroy, next to a newspaper
report about their incarceration in the course of the Philippines struggle.
William Pomeroy passed away on 12 January 2009 and Celia Pomeroy passed away on
22 August 2009.
Please download and read the text via the following
link:
On the Time for
Armed Struggle, 1974, Pomeroy (6800 words)
Further
reading:
How to Master Secret
Work, 1980, SACP (13929 words)
No comments:
Post a Comment