Part 5
“Immediacy”: Unselfconscious Being
Being, Essence and
Notion
The three divisions of the
Logic
Lenin wrote: “It is impossible completely to understand
Marx's Capital… without having thoroughly studied and understood the whole of
Hegel's Logic.” Our mission, given by Lenin, is therefore to thoroughly
study and understand the whole of Hegel’s Logic.
We soon find that there are actually two Logics: The Shorter Logic, and The Science of Logic; but
they are similar, and are both divided by three main headings: Being,
Essence and Notion.
This time we are going to reverse the order and take Andy
Blunden’s lecture as the main item, simply because Andy has done a great job.
There is a movement from Being, through Essence, to Notion.
This is not to deny the importance of the argument and the detail, but to say
that what distinguishes Hegel’s Logic is that it shows how things develop from
nothing to something. It is not a static philosophy of positions and
definitions. Nor is it an owners’ manual for the mind. It is a science of creation, and development.
The beginning is Being, which is “immediate”, with as yet no past and no
future. Hence our illustration of the unselfconscious puppy-dog, above.
The following are extracts from Andy Blunden’s lecture,
finishing with a reference back to Marx’s Capital, that may assist readers to
get a quick overview of Andy’s overview of Hegel’s “Logic”:
“I should mention here as an aside that all
Hegel’s major works have the same structure: he identifies the simple concept
or notion which marks the unconditioned starting point for the given science,
and then he applies the method, the model for which is given in the Logic, in
order to elaborate what is implicit in the given concept; he develops ‘the
peculiar internal development of the thing itself.’
“So, the Logic begins with a critique of
Being, what is contained in the concept of ‘Being’. The Logic is really the
study of concepts; so, the Concept is the truth of Being, whilst Being is the
Concept still ‘in itself’. The Third Book of the Logic is the Doctrine of the
Notion (or Concept which is same thing), that is, the Concept for itself. But
in the Doctrine of Being, the Concept is still just ‘in itself’.
“If there is to be some thing amidst the
infinite coming and going, the chaos of existence, the simplest actual thing
that can be is a Quality, something that persists amidst change. And if we ask
what it is that changes while it remains of the same quality, what changes when
the thing still remains what it is, then this is what we call Quantity. But a
thing cannot indefinitely undergo quantitative change and remain still what it
is, retain the same quality; at some point, a quantitative change amounts to a
change in Quality, and this Quantitative change which amounts to a Qualitative
change, the unity of Quality and Quantity, we call the Measure of the thing.
“Thus there are three grades of Being:
Quality, Quantity and Measure. We apply these categories to things that we
regard as objects, the business of the positivist sociologist, the observer.
Even a participant in a not yet emergent social change or sociological
category, has to play the role of sociologist to be conscious of it.
“Essence is reflection… When people reflect
on things, they do so only with the aid of what they already know. So
reflection is a good term. It is new Being, reflected in the mirror of old
concepts. It’s like what Marx was talking about in the “Eighteenth Brumaire of
Louis Bonaparte”:
‘The tradition
of all dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brains of the living.
And just as they seem to be occupied with revolutionizing themselves and
things, creating something that did not exist before, precisely in such epochs
of revolutionary crisis they anxiously conjure up the spirits of the past to
their service, borrowing from them names, battle slogans, and costumes in order
to present this new scene in world history in time-honoured disguise and
borrowed language.’ (18th Brumaire, I)
“The third part of the Logic is the Doctrine
of the Notion. Notion is a translation of the German word Begriff which is also translated as
‘concept’.
“The Doctrine of the Notion begins with an abstract notion, and the process of
the Notion is that it gets more and more concrete.
“The first section of the Notion is
Subjectivity, or the Subject. And here for the first time we get a glimpse of
Hegel’s conception of the subject: it is not an individual person in any sense
at all, but a simple element of consciousness arising from social practices
which implicate the whole community, reflected in language, the whole social
division of labour and so on.
“The process of the Doctrine of the Notion
is the abstract notion becoming more and more concrete. This process of
concretization takes place through objectification
of subjectivity, that is, through the subject-object relation. The first thing
to grasp about the Object, which is the second division of the Doctrine of the
Notion, is that the Object may be other Subjects, Subjects which are Objects in
relation to the Subject or Subjects which have become thoroughly objectified.
Objectification is not limited to the construction of material objects or
texts; it’s a bit like ‘mainstreaming’, or being institutionalized. The process
of development of the Subject is a striving to transform the Object according
to its own image, but in the process the Subject itself is changed and in the
process of objectification becomes a part of the living whole of the community.
“The unity of Subject and Object, the third
and last grade of the Doctrine of the Notion, is the Idea. The Idea can be
understood as the whole community as an intelligible whole, it is the summation
of the pure essentialities of a complete historical form of life. It is the
logical representation of Spirit, or of the development and life of an entire community, in the form of a
concrete concept.
“So the starting point of a science is the
Notion which forms the subject of the science, not Being. This is worth
mentioning because there is a widespread fallacy about the relation between
Marx’s Capital and Hegel’s Logic. Some writers have put Capital up against the
Logic, and in an effort to match them, start by equating the commodity relation
with Being, on the basis that the commodity relation is the “simplest relation”
or on the basis that the commodity relation is immediate. But the first thing
to be done in a science, according to Hegel (and Marx followed Hegel in this),
is to form a Notion of the subject, the simplest possible relation whose
unfolding produces the relevant science. In the case of Capital, this abstract
notion, the germ of capital, is the commodity relation. In the case of the
Philosophy of Right, it was the relation of Abstract Right, that is private
property. The problem of the origins of value or of the commodity relation is a
different question, and Marx demonstrates his familiarity with the Doctrine of
Essence in the third section of Chapter One, where the money-form is shown to
emerge out of a series of relations constituting historically articulated
resolutions of the problem of realizing an expanded division of labour.”
- The above is to introduce the original reading-text: Hegel’s
Logic - Being, Essence and Notion, 2007, Blunden.
No comments:
Post a Comment