Hegel, Part 6
Excerpts on Essence and
Notion
Andy Blunden’s two
lectures, for which he chose the excerpts from Hegel that are attached, and downloadable
via the link below, begin with Being and go via Essence, to Notion,
a journey that we have already taken with him once. Hegel also makes the same
trip twice, once in the Shorter Logic, and another time in the Science of Logic.
So let’s just say
that repetition is no bad thing when it comes to study.
We will return to
Andy’s marvellously illuminating lectures in the second instalment of this part
of our course on Hegel, but let us note for now part of the quote from Hegel’s “Shorter Logic” that Andy gives in the
beginning of the first of these two lectures. Says Hegel:
“Most
commonly the refutation is taken in a purely negative sense to mean that the
system refuted has ceased to count for anything, has been set aside and done
for. Were it so, the history of philosophy would be, of all studies, most
saddening, displaying, as it does, the refutation of every system which time
has brought forth. Now although it may be admitted that every philosophy has
been refuted, it must be in an equal degree maintained that no philosophy has
been refuted. And that in two ways. For first, every philosophy that deserves
the name always embodies the Idea: and secondly, every system represents one
particular factor or particular stage in the evolution of the Idea. The
refutation of a philosophy, therefore, only means that its barriers are
crossed, and its special principle reduced to a factor in the completer
principle that follows.”
And then at the end
of the two Andy Blunden lectures, he writes: “Development is the struggle of
opposites which do not disappear”.
This is the
unity-and-struggle-of-opposites that we have picked up from Marx and Engels but
which actually comes from their predecessor, Hegel, in exactly the manner that
Hegel describes in the quotation above it.
It is wrong and
doubly wrong to say that Marx and/or Engels refuted and did away with Hegel, as
some have said and many more have assumed was the case. Hegel remains, and will
always remain, “a factor in the completer
principle that follows”.
Now frankly, in the
Communist University, we would love to find in any book the most concise, lucid
passage, and if possible a single paragraph or sentence, that gave us the whole
content of the book summed up. Through Clausewitz, Marx, Engels and Lenin we
have sought and found the richest and most concentrated “short texts” to use
for the stimulation of our dialogues.
Also frank is Hegel
- a very careful man - who has warned us from the start that he does not want
us to be doing any such thing with his work.
Be that as it may, the
four excerpts that Andy Blunden picked out on this occasion may be the closest
we come to a short text from Hegel, in his own words, which would go towards fulfilling
Lenin’s insistence that we must “thoroughly
study and understand the whole of Hegel’s Logic.”
They cover Action and
Reaction, Content and Form, Notion,
and Development.
There are many cards in the Hegel pack. These four are as near
to being a “full house” as we are likely to find. Not forgetting that our first
business with Hegel is to understand what Marx got from Hegel.
Hegel is not always obscure. The following is clear enough:
“Real works of art are those where content
and form exhibit a thorough identity. The content of the Iliad, it may be said,
is the Trojan war, and especially the wrath of Achilles. In that we have
everything, and yet very little after all; for the Iliad is made an Iliad by
the poetic form, in which that content is moulded.
“The content of Romeo and Juliet may similarly
be said to be the ruin of two lovers through the discord between their
families: but something more is needed to make Shakespeare's immortal tragedy.”
- The above is to introduce the original reading-text: Excerpts on Essence and Notion.
No comments:
Post a Comment